➢ Skin and soft-tissue infections have become increasingly common in the sports world. Recent reports have shown that these infections are prevalent throughout all arenas of sport, and efforts to decrease colonization of bacteria and fungi are now essential for preventing the development of SSTIs.
➢ Education on cleansing and hygiene are a vital part of this process, and, as such, the team physician and the team athletic trainers play an important role in the education of the athlete and all members of the athletic team.
➢ The impact of SSTIs on individuals and the athletic team may be severe and have the potential for notable consequences, including loss of playing time, hospitalization, and even surgery. Continued efforts to better understand and to prevent the development of SSTIs are paramount.
Skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs) often occur in athletes during training for competitive sports or during actual competition, and the majority of these infections are bacterial or fungal in origin1. SSTIs can have an immediate impact on athletic eligibility and could threaten the ability to compete or to participate in games during the course of a single season or an entire career. The consequences resulting from restricted participation due to an SSTI may impact win-loss records as well as financial incentives such as scholarships or contracts2. In addition to athletes who participate in competitive sports, millions of people regularly visit fitness centers or recreational gymnasiums in an attempt to stay fit and healthy. Studies have shown that these gymnasiums are sources of large quantities of bacteria that could cause SSTIs, which may then impact the lives and work of many people in any community3,4.
The present review describes the mechanisms by which bacterial SSTIs occur in healthy athletes, the prevalence of SSTIs among players in various sports (including the effect of player position and the sites of the body commonly infected in each sport), the mechanisms by which SSTIs are spread, and hygiene measures that are recommended to prevent the spread of infection. Extrapolating these lessons into the general population of so-called weekend warriors or fitness enthusiasts may then help us to better understand, prevent, and treat these increasingly complicated infections.
Mechanisms by Which SSTIs Occur in Healthy Athletes
Studies of the human microbiome have shown that billions of bacteria, fungi, and other microbes inhabit the skin and that these microorganisms vary between individuals and between different sites on the skin5-7. In fact, each region of the body’s skin is home to its own distinct community of microbes. This microbe “biome” may extend several centimeters out and away from the skin of the body and is subject to temperature, moisture, wind, and movement5,6,8. The characteristics of these various colonies depend on the surrounding environment. Factors such as skin characteristics, sebaceous gland concentration, moisture content, temperature, host genetics, and exogenous environmental factors (including hygiene practices) can influence each community9.
A recent study of the human skin microbiome showed that skin-to-skin contact during a sporting event can alter the microbial composition of the skin environment10. The investigators hypothesized that sports in which contestants have substantial skin-to-skin collisions might disrupt these ecosystems on the skin and allow microbes to be shared among players. They selected roller derby as the model high-contact sport to study. Skaters from 3 geographically different areas were competing in a derby tournament. The researchers took swab samples from the exposed upper arms of skaters from each of the teams before and after matches. DNA analysis following these matches demonstrated that similarities in bacterial communities predicted team membership. Furthermore, when competing teams participated in an hour-long match, their microbial communities became more homogeneous, suggesting that simple contact was enough to change the microbial community makeup of a player, at least temporarily.
Contact sports were also the focus of a study by Jiménez-Truque et al.11. Those investigators evaluated 377 male and female varsity athletes with monthly swabs of the nares and throat at regular intervals over 2 academic years. The study group consisted of 224 athletes participating in contact sports (e.g., lacrosse, basketball, wrestling, football, and soccer) and 153 athletes participating in noncontact sports (e.g., golf, cross country, and baseball). Results showed that collegiate contact athletes were carriers of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) more than twice as frequently as were noncontact athletes or similar individuals from the general population. In that 2-year study, MRSA colonization was found in 8% to 31% of contact athletes, compared with 0% to 23% of noncontact athletes. In comparison, roughly 5% of the community at large was positive for MRSA colonization. Furthermore, MRSA was acquired more quickly and colonization lasted for greater periods in contact athletes than in noncontact athletes11.
Maceration of the skin due to sweating also occurs during athletic competition, and this change in skin integrity yields a hospitable reproductive environment for bacteria and other organisms. Trauma implicit to sports participation can also damage the cutaneous barrier, allowing microorganisms to penetrate into deeper tissue layers12. In addition, strenuous training or competition may make athletes temporarily more susceptible to infections13. Extended periods of intense exercise temporarily depress certain aspects of the immune system, including natural killer cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, immunoglobulin levels, and interleukin-2 levels14-18. During this window of altered immunity, the body demonstrates an increased vulnerability to environmental pathogens, and microbes may take advantage of this altered state and cause infection19,20.
Mechanisms by Which SSTIs Are Spread
As SSTIs are widespread throughout various sports, it is important to understand both the mode of transmission and methodologies for the prevention of spread. Transmission of bacterial organisms typically results from skin-to-skin collision with a person who has an SSTI, as previously suggested. Therefore, SSTIs are commonly found in athletes who participate in contact sports, such as those in which skin-to-skin physical contact is implicit. Athletes who participate in these collision or contact sports often sustain injuries involving cutaneous barriers (e.g., turf burns, lacerations, and abrasions), which could facilitate the entry of pathogens11,21.
For athletes participating in events without contact or with limited skin-to-skin collision (e.g., marathon running and swimming), other factors may contribute to SSTI transmission, including sharing of bars of soap, shower cloths, water bottles, uniforms, shaving products, whirlpools, and so on22. In addition, locker rooms, workout areas, and fitness-center equipment surfaces may be contaminated with bacteria and fungi that can cause an SSTI3,4,23,24.
S. aureus Infections in the Athletic Population
S. aureus is the most frequently isolated bacterial pathogen in all athletic groups and deserves special mention from the outset. S. aureus may lead to a wide array of infections, ranging from cutaneous or superficial skin infections to more severe invasive infections that can be fatal. Recently, S. aureus infections have demonstrated resistance to methicillin or similar penicillin-type antibiotics, which has made treatment and cure difficult. These difficult strains are now referred to as MRSA.
Despite the recent rise in MRSA isolates, 20% to 30% of the general population is also asymptomatically colonized with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA)25,26. Sites most commonly colonized by either pathogen include the nostrils (anterior nares)27, upper airway, digestive tract, skin, and genital mucosa (Fig. 1)27. This asymptomatic colonization does not necessarily pose an immediate risk to the carrier; however, it may be a risk factor for transmission to other susceptible individuals as well as for the development of later symptomatic infection26-28.
When first recognized, MRSA colonies were typically isolated to hospitals (hospital-acquired [HA]-MRSA), health-care facilities, and patients frequently seeking care in these environments. As a result, MRSA infections rarely occurred in healthy individuals. However, beginning in the late 20th century, epidemiologists and physicians noted a substantial increase in MRSA infections among healthy people in the general population, and especially in athletes (Fig. 2)29-33. A recent survey of 364 members the National Athletic Trainers Association revealed that more than half (53%) of all athletic trainers had treated MRSA infections in their athletes, with the majority (92%) being SSTIs30. The dramatic increase in community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) has necessitated a need for orthopaedic surgeons to become more familiar with the identification of the organism and to develop an awareness of treatment algorithms29.
CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA are characterized by their genetic mechanisms of resistance and virulence. Two separate components define the CA-MRSA bacterial strains. The first component, which is similar to that seen in HA-MRSA, allows for resistance to antibiotics such as methicillin and other beta-lactam agents. The second element, atypical of HA-MRSA, is a cytotoxin that enhances tissue necrosis. The latter is of most concern and is thought to come from a virulent protein factor known as Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL). Several studies have shown this protein to be present in nearly all known CA-MRSA strains but in <5% of HA-MRSA isolates31-33. The PVL cytotoxin has the ability to lyse white blood cells and to cause necrosis of mucosa and skin. This property likely allows many CA-MRSA infections to progress to abscess formation and to transmit infection through exposed soft tissue31-33.
Despite the preponderance of S. aureus and CA-MRSA in athletes, other infections are also common and can present similar challenges. In the following sections, we will review common types of bacterial infections among a myriad of professional and recreational athletes.
Prevalence of SSTIs Among Players in Various Sports
Bacterial infections have been widely reported among professional football players. The media have noted a large number of MRSA infections in National Football League (NFL) players, including members of the Cleveland Browns34-36, New York Giants37, Miami Dolphins37-39, Tampa Bay Buccaneers37-39, Washington Redskins40, Indianapolis Colts41, and New England Patriots42. Despite this wide reporting, we found only 2 reports on MRSA SSTIs outside of the lay press43,44.
Throughout the course of 1 season, 8 MRSA infections were found in 5 (9%) of 58 St. Louis Rams players43. Infections were noted at the sites of skin lesions (turf burns) over the elbows, knees, or arms (Fig. 3) of offensive linemen, defensive linemen, and 1 linebacker. All of these infections eventually required operative treatment with incision and drainage as they failed to respond to antibiotic treatment and evolved into abscesses measuring 5 to 7 cm in diameter. While none of the players required hospital admission, 3 players missed between 1 and 12 days (total, 17 working days) of competition secondary to treatment of the infection. These findings are not necessarily unexpected as a recent cohort study revealed that players participating as linemen or linebackers demonstrated a significantly increased relative risk of infection with MRSA (10.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3 to ∞], p = 0.02) when compared with players in skill positions such as quarterbacks or running backs43. Players with cutaneous MRSA infections demonstrated significantly higher body-mass indices (BMIs), and had more frequently used antibiotics during the prior 12 months (relative risk, 7.8; 95% CI, 0.5 to ∞) than those who completed the season without evidence of infection, although the difference was not significant43.
In an attempt to avoid, treat, and prevent MRSA outbreaks during NFL competition, 108 players and associated personnel from the San Francisco 49ers underwent index nasal swabs at the start of the season and had follow-up cultures of specimens from wounds and nares in cases of suspected MRSA infections throughout the season44. Despite this careful surveillance program and aggressive preventative measures to limit the spread of bacteria, 5 (4.6%) of the 108 individuals were found to have new-onset culture-confirmed MRSA skin infections throughout the season. None of these 5 team members had MRSA-positive nasal cultures during index testing, suggesting the difficulty of controlling spread in such high-contact environments.
MRSA outbreaks among college football teams also have been well documented in the literature11,45-53. In 2000, a MRSA SSTI outbreak occurred in 10 members of a collegiate football program in Pennsylvania45. Seven (70%) of the affected patients required hospitalization and intravenous antibiotics to treat the infection. These MRSA infections were thought to be associated with minor skin trauma resulting from turf abrasions or shaving and the sharing of unlaundered shower towels. Similarly, 2 players from a collegiate team in Los Angeles were hospitalized for the treatment of MRSA skin infections within the same week during the 2002 season45. One of these players did not respond to antibiotic therapy and required extensive surgical debridement, leading to a subsequent skin-grafting procedure for cutaneous coverage. Players from that team reported infrequent treatment or coverage of cutaneous wounds (occurring only 50% of the time), despite frequent and recurrent trauma to the skin. Staff from the team further suggested that the sharing of skin balms and lubricants contributed to the spread of infection.
Between 2000 and 2010, multiple cases of MRSA infections were reported throughout an array of collegiate teams. While many were simple skin infections that were treated with oral antibiotics, there were several reports of small abscesses requiring surgical decompression as well as 1 case of necrotizing fasciitis leading to multiple surgical interventions and prolonged hospitalization11,46-53. The majority of infections occurred in areas of exposed skin, and common sites of infection included the elbow, knee, leg, and forearm. In situations in which infections occurred in areas typically covered by clothing (e.g., thigh or torso), transmission was attributed to at least biweekly sharing of a cold tub or whirlpool46. The prevalence of infection was higher in linemen and linebackers, which was postulated to be consistent with substantial skin-to-skin contact relating to play at these positions11,46-53. Other risk factors found to be associated with MRSA transmission included abrasions from turf or artificial playing surfaces (turf burns) and shaving of body hair. An overview of these groups is shown in Table I.
Despite the known risk factors, there have been reports of the ability to reduce and control infections in these collegiate settings. Studies have demonstrated that, following the institution of a campaign to promote education, the use of hexachlorophene-containing soap, increased presence of hand-sanitizing agents, disposable towels, cleansing and decontamination of training and weight-room equipment, and bathing or showering prior to the use of athletic training facilities, a substantial reduction in the rate of infection transmission is possible47-49.
There are fewer reports of SSTI outbreaks in high school football players. Over a 5-year span, 3 reports demonstrated that between 10% and 14% of players on evaluated teams were affected by skin infections (Table II)54-56. The majority of the cases were either culture-proven MRSA or suspected MRSA, and linemen carried a 4 times greater likelihood of infection than those playing other positions55. Furthermore, in 1 report, the risk of MRSA infection was 8 times higher among athletes who shared towels or washcloths with others than among those who used only their own items. The subset of athletes who were infected with MRSA were found to have an increased BMI when compared with those without infection55,56, and athletes who were found to have proven cases of S. aureus infection also admitted to dressing in the same game uniform or practice apparel as many as 11 times without washing between uses.
We are aware of only 2 reports on bacterial SSTIs affecting rugby players in the medical literature57,58. In 1 report, 5 (33%) of 15 members of a rugby team in the United Kingdom (all of whom played the forward position) presented to the team physician because of a cutaneous MRSA infection57, and all of them had recently played in a match against a visiting team from the South Pacific. In the subsequent 10 days, all of the infections progressed to large abscesses measuring several centimeters in width at various body locations, including the shoulder region, head, neck, and back. In the second report, 37 suspected cases of skin infection were observed in participants from 4 different Belgian rugby clubs, and cultures of specimens from 5 of these wounds were positive for Streptococcus pyogenes emm type 81, suggesting that many had been exposed to similar modes of infection58.
There have been several reports of MRSA outbreaks in soccer teams59,60. A 26-member Slovenian soccer team was affected by an outbreak of a highly virulent and contagious MRSA SSTI59. Eleven team members and the team masseuse (46%) were diagnosed with cutaneous MRSA infections. Bilateral staphylococcal furunculosis of the lower extremity was seen in 10 players, nasal colonization was found in 1 player who subsequently developed a MRSA-positive perianal abscess, and eczematous dermatitis of the hands developed in the masseuse. During the 2005-2006 season, members of a Dutch soccer club along with close team associates experienced an outbreak of MRSA infections60. Several players had skin infections, and 1 member of the team was hospitalized because of an abscess that was attributed to MRSA. Forty-two members of the soccer club (all of whom utilized the same shower facilities, locker rooms, and training equipment) along with 14 of their roommates were screened for the organism. Of the 56 individuals who were screened, 11 were found to have a MRSA infection, including 9 (21%) of 42 soccer players and 2 (14%) of 14 roommates. The genesis of this outbreak was later attributed to contact with a member from a visiting team with an exposed boil that tested positive for MRSA following completion of the match.
With extensive and continuous skin-to-skin collision during grappling and maneuvering, a large number of bacterial SSTIs are plausible in wrestlers. However, a majority of reported infections are fungal in nature61-73, and we are aware of only 2 reports of MRSA SSTIs among wrestlers45,74. In 1 report, 7 (22%) of 32 members of a high school wrestling team in Vermont, as well as 6 other individuals who were closely related to the athletes, were found to be infected with MRSA during an outbreak between January 1993 and February 199474. Of those infected, 6 wrestlers sought medical attention and were found to have boils on the arms or legs that were positive for MRSA on culture. Another patient was found to have positive results on culture of specimens from the anterior nares. One infected team member had progressive cellulitis that required admission to the local hospital and was found to have lymphangitis and septicemia associated with the cutaneous infection. Although the cause of this outbreak was indeterminate, members of the team typically practiced as a group on the same mats and wrestling floors without clothing covering the legs or arms for 6 days each week, and contact in these exposed areas was thought to play a contributing role. A second report revealed that 2 wrestlers from the same high school team in Indiana had cutaneous MRSA infections45. Those teammates competed in different weight classes, and as such had not wrestled against each other, even in a practice setting. This finding suggested that in sports such as wrestling, in which skin frequently comes in contact with a common playing surface, cleansing of shared spaces and limiting the use of communal hygiene products are of utmost importance.
Skin infections also have been reported in athletes participating in college basketball21,75, volleyball21, tennis, and weightlifting21,76. While SSTIs also have been reported in athletes participating in marathon running, swimming, and judo, we are not aware of any cases of bacterial infection in such athletes; instead, all of the reported cases involved only fungal infections77-87. Although the majority of bacterial infections are due to cutaneous beta-hemolytic streptococci or MRSA, pitted keratolysis (a condition characterized by foul-smelling pits on the plantar or dorsal aspect of the foot) also has been seen12. The latter is typically provoked by gram-positive bacterial species, such as Corynebacterium or Micrococcus, and is treated with topical antibiotics such as erythromycin or clindamycin. Another effective antimicrobial agent is topical benzoyl peroxide, which not only kills the infecting organisms but also creates a difficult environment for bacterial growth by making the skin dry. Athletes with such infections should avoid wearing cotton socks as such socks keep the foot warm and moist12.
Measures to Prevent the Spread of Infection
Given that infections occur in association with a variety of sporting activities, a thorough knowledge of mechanisms to prevent spread is of utmost importance. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)45, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)88, the National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA)89, and the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)90 have all provided guidelines for steps that should be taken to avoid bacterial and fungal infections and outbreaks in locker rooms, private and school gymnasiums, and fitness centers.
Because even limited contact with infected areas can lead to spread, athletes should be excluded from participation if wounds cannot be properly covered by a securely attached bandage or dressing that contains all drainage and remains intact during activity91. Even in the setting of properly covered wounds, appropriate hygiene measures must be stressed to prevent spread. An athlete also may be excluded at the discretion of the physician if participation poses a health risk to the infected athlete (such as injury to the infected area), even if the infection can be properly covered91.
Treating abrasions or cuts involving the skin is an important preventative mechanism. All cutaneous lesions should be cleaned with soap and water and covered with a clean, dry bandage before the return to sports participation is considered29. These hygiene practices, along with avoidance of contact with any draining or weeping skin lesions of other athletes, are the most effective means for preventing the spread of SSTIs45. All wounds, including all cuts and scrapes, should be covered adequately before participation; if the wound cannot be completely and securely protected, the athlete should be excluded from participation in practice or games until the lesions are fully healed or are small enough to be appropriately dressed45. All athletes with open wounds, abrasions, or lacerations should be excluded from whirlpools or common tubs, and spaces that are jointly used should be sanitized between uses45. Some studies have also revealed that, in individuals with S. aureus SSTIs, the addition of chlorhexidine body washes92,93 or “bleach baths” (i.e., soaking in a bathtub containing a dilute solution of household bleach) to routine hygiene measures may help to decrease the colonization of organisms and prevent recurrence92,94,95.
The most effective behavioral practice in preventing of spread of SSTIs such as MRSA is hand washing29. All athletes, including individuals who exercise at fitness centers, should frequently and thoroughly wash the hands with soap or an alcohol-based hand sanitizer to limit the transmission of bacterial pathogens89. The use of plain or antimicrobial soap products is equally effective, but hand washing with liquid soap is preferred over bar soap in order to limit multi-person use96. Both hands should be cleansed before and after sporting activities, and the practice should especially be followed when using shared weight-training equipment, when using communal showers or locker rooms, after providing wound care, and when changing bandages96. Hand washing is also particularly important after palpation of infected skin or after using an object that has come into direct contact with a draining wound88.
Athletes should shower in soapy warm or hot water as soon as possible after the completion of a workout, practice, or game competition29,45,89. Individuals who exercise at health clubs should also shower immediately after working out on shared fitness equipment94. Personal items such as towels, clothing, razors, and bar soap should not be shared45,89.
All athletes, including individuals who work out at fitness centers, should place a barrier (e.g., an item of clothing or a cloth towel) between bare skin and commonly shared surfaces, including exercise machines, massage tables, weight-training devices, and sauna and steam-room benches96. All workout clothing, including team-supplied uniforms and towels used for sports and exercise, should be washed after each use in hot water with bleach or detergent29,97. To avoid moist environments that promote bacterial growth, complete drying of clothes in a dryer is recommended96. Locker rooms should not provide communal jars of ointments that athletes apply by placing the hands into an open container96. In gymnasiums, health clubs, and fitness centers, bar soap should be replaced with liquid soap to limit sharing90. Individual or disposable, single-use products should replace commonly used communal towels during practice or competition2,47-49.
Environmental interventions aimed at controlling the spread of bacterial and fungal infections in athletes focus primarily on thorough cleansing and sterilization of shared or frequently used equipment. Cleansing is the key to decreasing colonization29, and a focus on surfaces that have frequent contact with skin (e.g., benches, door handles, water coolers, showers, tubs, and toilet seats) is of utmost importance88. All shared equipment and athletic gear (e.g., helmets, protective gear, and wrestling mats) should be cleaned prior to, and following, each individual use, practice, or competition29.
Disinfectants and detergents designed specifically for athletic equipment are commercially available. All of these agents are simple and effective solutions for routine cleansing of high-contact surfaces88. Care should be exercised, however, as the overuse of prepackaged antibiotic wipes or towelettes may actually lead to an increased potential for the development of resistant organisms, so appropriate use as recommended by the manufacturers of these items and label guidelines should be followed88. If prepackaged products are not available for disinfection of equipment, a dilute bleach solution made by combining 1 gallon (3.8 L) of water with 1/4 cup (60 mL) of regular household bleach (i.e., a 1:100 dilution equivalent to 500 to 615 ppm of available chlorine) can be used to produce similar results29,90,92. If athletic equipment is damaged to an extent that impervious surfaces are breached and appropriate cleansing is prevented, replacement, repair, or disposal of these items is recommended90.
Treatment of SSTIs in Athletes
While the most important method for the avoidance of SSTIs is appropriate prevention, athletes who have contracted an infection should be managed according to the most recent guidelines put forth by the IDSA88. For athletes with nonpurulent cellulitis, oral beta-lactam antibiotics providing coverage for beta-hemolytic streptococci, including penicillin and cephalosporins, are recommended as a first-line treatment. Patients who do not respond to beta-lactam agents should be managed empirically for CA-MRSA with oral clindamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), a tetracycline such as doxycycline or minocycline, or linezolid88,98. The antibiotic regimen is typically continued for 5 to 10 days but should be individualized on the basis of patient symptoms and response to treatment. If concurrent treatment for both beta-hemolytic streptococci and CA-MRSA is desired, the use of isolated oral clindamycin, TMP-SMX, or linezolid is typically effective. However, a combination of a tetracycline agent and a beta-lactam also can be utilized88,98
Athletes presenting with purulent cellulitis are considered to be positive for CA-MRSA; in such cases, culture specimens should be obtained and empiric antibiotic treatment should be initiated. In such settings, treatment for beta-hemolytic streptococci typically is not required as such infections are unlikely to cause purulent discharge88. For purulent lesions originating from a cutaneous abscess, the recommended initial treatment is incision and drainage. Isolated incision and drainage typically is adequate for the treatment of a simple abscess; however, the currently available literature does not clearly define the role of, or need for, antibiotic therapy in these settings88. Nevertheless, there are clearly defined circumstances in which adjunctive treatment of an abscess with antibiotics is appropriate, including cases involving severely purulent or large abscesses; extensive involvement of multiple body locations; accelerated advancement of disease associated with cellulitis, systemic illness, an immunosuppressed state, or associated comorbid conditions; abscesses in very young or very old patients; abscesses located in areas that are difficult to treat with incision and drainage (such as the face, web space of the hand, and genitalia); concomitant septic phlebitis; or failure to completely respond to isolated incision and drainage88,98. To ensure appropriate treatment, culture specimens should be obtained when the patient has an abscess meeting the aforementioned criteria, when the patient has an inadequate response to initial treatment, or when there is concern for an outbreak or cluster infection.
Special considerations should be observed when managing children who have SSTIs. In children and adolescents presenting with superficial cutaneous infections such as impetigo, or in the setting of secondarily infected skin lesions related to eczema, ulcers, or lacerations, topical mupirocin 2% ointment can be used effectively88. Tetracycline agents are not recommended, and should be avoided, for children under 8 years of age as they may cause permanent tooth discoloration or affect growth88.
If an athlete develops recurrent SSTIs despite appropriate treatment and preventative measures, referral to an infectious-disease specialist and concomitant skin and nasal decolonization may be considered88,98-100. These strategies can be offered in conjunction with the ongoing recommended treatment. The best initial option for decolonization of the skin and nares is treatment with bleach baths and intranasal mupirocin, respectively; chlorhexidine and intranasal mupirocin also can be utilized as the first option can be cumbersome and has demonstrated poor compliance99,100. However, recent evidence also has suggested that the use of sodium hypochlorite body wash is associated with improved compliance and decolonization success101.
SSTIs have become increasingly common in the sports world. Efforts to decrease colonization of bacteria and fungi are now essential for preventing the development of SSTIs. Education on cleansing and hygiene are a vital part of this process. The team physician and the team athletic trainers play the most important role in the education of the athlete and all members of the athletic team. The concept of the athletic team also includes anyone in contact with the athlete or athletic training facility, such as all members of the coaching and training staff, as well as the families in contact with the participants. The impact of SSTIs on individuals and the athletic team may be severe and has the potential for notable consequences, including loss of playing time, hospitalization, and even surgery. Providers should stay up to date on the information regarding the recognition, prevention, and treatment of SSTIs, and online guidelines published by the CDC can be very useful for providers in their continued efforts to better understand and to prevent the development of SSTIs91,96,102.
Investigation performed at The Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado
Disclosure: There was no external funding source. The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article.
- Copyright © 2017 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated